| 98MAR 17 1887
In re Schultz.
The matter of the charges and specifications of misconduct against Johann Ernst Schultz, a student in the Medical College, now coming on for consideration, and the return of service of the citation heretofore directed to Mr. Schultz, being produced and placed on file, the following resolution was after due consideration adopted:
Whereas, heretofore, to [wit ion] the 16th.day of December A. D. 1886, certain charges and specifications were presented to the Board of Regents of the University of Nebraska against one John Ernst Schultz, formerly a student in the Medical College of said University, in substance charging said Schultz with false, fraudulent and improper statements and representations by him made to the authorities of said University and said Medical College, whereby and whereunder the said Schultz had obtained, or sought and endeavored to have, procure and obtain certain preferment, advancement, recognition, benefit, privilege degree, diploma and advantage, to which the said Schultz was not and would not upon a true statement and condition of affairs be entitled, said charges and specifications being among the files in the office of the Secretary and Steward of said University : and,
In re Schultz
Whereas, Duly certified copies of said charges and specifications, together with a citation to said Schultz to be and appear before said Board of Regents of said University on the 16th day of March 1887, were, as appears from the record and return on said citation endorsed, duly served on said Schultz on the 8th. day of January A. D. 1887 (a duplicate copy of said citation with the return and record of service thereon endorsed, is with the files in the office of the Secretary and Steward of said University) and
Whereas, said Schultz has wholly and utterly failed, neglected and refused to be and appear on the date and at the place fixed, before said Board or any member therof, either in person or by agent or attorney, and has wholly and utterly failed, neglected and refused to present, offer or tender any answer, response, reply, statement or proof adverse to or contradictory of said charges and specifications : and whereas, the Board of Regents, upon information, statement and correspondence had and received concerning the allegations in said charges and specifications set forth, have good reason to and do beleive the said charges and specifications and all thereof are true and well founded as against said Schultz
In re Schultz
NOW THEREFORE, Be it resolved, that said charges and specifications hereinbefore referred to and all thereof are declared to be and the same are taken, accepted and found to be true, exact and correct as the same are formulated, stated and
95
| 98MAR 17 1887
In re Schultz.
The matter of the charges and specifications of misconduct against Johann Ernst Schultz, a student in the Medical College, now coming on for consideration, and the return of service of the citation heretofore directed to Mr. Schultz, being produced and placed on file, the following resolution was after due consideration adopted:
Whereas, heretofore, to [wit ion] the 16th.day of December A. D. 1886, certain charges and specifications were presented to the Board of Regents of the University of Nebraska against one John Ernst Schultz, formerly a student in the Medical College of said University, in substance charging said Schultz with false, fraudulent and improper statements and representations by him made to the authorities of said University and said Medical College, whereby and whereunder the said Schultz had obtained, or sought and endeavored to have, procure and obtain certain preferment, advancement, recognition, benefit, privilege degree, diploma and advantage, to which the said Schultz was not and would not upon a true statement and condition of affairs be entitled, said charges and specifications being among the files in the office of the Secretary and Steward of said University : and,
In re Schultz
Whereas, duly certified copies of said charges and specifications, together with a citation to said Schultz to be and appear before said Board of Regents of said University on the 16th day of March 1887, were, as appears from the record and return on said citation endorsed, duly served on said Schultz on the 8th. day of January A. D. 1887 (a duplicate copy of said citation with the return and record of service thereon endorsed, is with the files in the office of the Secretary and Steward of said University) and
Whereas, said Schultz has wholly and utterly failed, neglected and refused to be and appear on the date and at the place fixed, before said Board or any member therof, either in person or by agent or attorney, and has wholly and utterly failed, neglected and refused to present, offer or tender any answer, response, reply, statement or proof adverse to or contradictory of said charges and specifications : and whereas, the Board of Regents, upon information, statement and correspondence had and received concerning the allegations in said charges and specifications set forth, have good reason to and do beleive the said charges and specifications and all thereof are true and well founded as against said Schultz
In re Schultz
NOW THEREFORE, Be it resolved, that said charges and specifications hereinbefore referred to and all thereof are declared to be and the same are taken, accepted and found to be true, exact and correct as the same are formulated, stated and
95
|
