145

OverviewTranscribeVersionsHelp

Here you can see all page revisions and compare the changes have been made in each revision. Left column shows the page title and transcription in the selected revision, right column shows what have been changed. Unchanged text is highlighted in white, deleted text is highlighted in red, and inserted text is highlighted in green color.

4 revisions
Whit at Apr 03, 2020 03:35 PM

145

SHOOTING
182, STRAND, LONDON, NOVEMBER 16, 1887.

MISS ANNIE OAKLEY'S GUNS.
Sir,--I should like to ask Mr. Charles Lancaster why he did not do himself and Miss Oakley more justice than by building her a pear of 20-bores, when it was in his power to have given her something far more effective?
Your remarks on the inadequacy of so small a charge as 2 1/2 drs. and 3/4 oz. of shot for pigeon shooting, to compete on equal terms with 12-bore guns, are perfectly correct, though I should scarcely have expected them; but I fail to see why Mr. Lancas-ter should have thus handicapped Miss Oakley by compelling her unnecessarily to use them.
You remark on the "difficulty with which Mr. Lancaster had had to contend in building guns for a girl of eight stones weight," and you might have added, "and he has increased the difficulty by the resolution that they shall be 20-bore guns."
Seeing that guns are now advertised of 4 1/2 lbs. weight, and 12-bore shooting 3drs. and 1 1/8 oz. of shot, I confess it puzzles me why Mr. Lancaster should have gone out of his way to give Miss Oakley guns a full 1lb. heavier, of inferior bore, and shooting a far inferior charge. With those light 12-bores, and their charge, she could have competed with other 12-bores on equal footing, and her shooting would not then have been open to the charge of cruelty under which it at present would seen to lie in your estimation, by using so small a charge at 25yds. CIGAR.

145

SHOOTING
182, STRAND, LONDON, NOVEMBER 16, 1887.

MISS ANNIE OAKLEY'S GUNS.
Sir,--I should like to ask Mr. Charles Lancaster why he did not do himself and Miss Oakley more justice than by building her a pear of 20-bores, when it was in his power to have given her something far more effective?
Your remarks on the inadequacy of so small a charge as 2 1/2 drs. and 3/4 oz. of shot for pigeon shooting, to compete on equal terms with 12-bore guns, are perfectly correct, though I should scarcely have expected them; but I fail to see why Mr. Lancas-ter should have thus handicapped Miss Oakley by compelling her unnecessarily to use them.
You remark on the "difficulty with which Mr. Lancaster had had to contend in building guns for a girl of eight stones weight," and you might have added, "and he has increased the difficulty by the resolution that they shall be 20-bore guns."
Seeing that guns are now advertised of 4 1/2 lbs. weight, and 12-bore shooting 3drs. and 1 1/8 oz. of shot, I confess it puzzles me why Mr. Lancaster should have gone out of his way to give Miss Oakley guns a full 1lb. heavier, of inferior bore, and shooting a far inferior charge. With those light 12-bores, and their charge, she could have competed with other 12-bores on equal footing, and her shooting would not then have been open to the charge of cruelty under which it at present would seen to lie in your estimation, by using so small a charge at 25yds. CIGAR.