DashboardCollectionsFAQSign UpSign In

373

OverviewTranscribeVersionsHelp

Here you can see all page revisions and compare the changes have been made in each revision. Left column shows the page title and transcription in the selected revision, right column shows what have been changed. Unchanged text is highlighted in white, deleted text is highlighted in red, and inserted text is highlighted in green color.

3 revisions
mdierks at May 26, 2020 01:45 PM
mdierksArchives & Special CollectionsArchives & Special Collections

373

some are really considerably
larger.

268. paragraph. (b) The [Phaeosporae?]
are not related to [Fucus?] but
to the Zoosporeae. Their zoospores
are well known but no
[oospores?] have been found. See
also p. 339. Under Zoosporeae
you have placed [Ectocorpeae?],
[Sppocelareaei?], [Sporochuneae?],
& L[?], all of which
belong to the Phaeosporeae! In
what sense do you use the
term Phaeosporeae as a
subdivision of Oospores lower
down? Siphonaceae [?]
included [Vaucheria?] which is
oosporic, but where do
we find any facts to show
that the Siphonaceae as usually
understood at present belong
to the Oosporeae?

p. 277. You might have said
under B[abrachospermeae?] that we

373