304

OverviewTranscribeVersionsHelp

Here you can see all page revisions and compare the changes have been made in each revision. Left column shows the page title and transcription in the selected revision, right column shows what have been changed. Unchanged text is highlighted in white, deleted text is highlighted in red, and inserted text is highlighted in green color.

4 revisions
mdierks at Jul 28, 2020 10:53 AM

304

3

from those in my specimen, then
I can only think that my
specimens are Ent. [Calopteni?]
which has [conidia?] like E. Grylli
but is distinct in its resping spores.

You also sent a specimen
of diseased rice leaves which
come from Louisiana I believe.
I have compared it with
the various fungi on rice
described principally by the
Italian botanists and it is
distinct from any of them.
Neither is it the [Ustilago virus?]
[?] found on rice. The fungus
seems to me to be Entyloma
[crastophilani?] fasc. I have one
specimen from the west but
the fungus is not so luxuriant
as in the rice leaves.

I send some [Entomopthora?]

304

3

from those in my specimen, then
I can only think that my
specimens are Ent. [Calopteni?]
which has [conidia?] like E. Grylli
but is distinct in its resping spores.

You also sent a specimen
of diseased rice leaves which
come from Louisiana I believe.
I have compared it with
the various fungi on rice
described principally by the
Italian botanists and it is
distinct from any of them.
Neither is it the [Ustilago virus?]
[?] found on rice. The fungus
seems to me to be Entyloma
[crastophilani?] fasc. I have one
specimen from the west but
the fungus is not so luxuriant
as in the rice leaves.

I send some [Entomopthora?]