251

University of California,
College of Agriculture,
Berkeley, October 18, 1881.

Dear Professor Bessey,

In answer to yous of the 18th, I would say that just at
present the question of a state entomologist is an abeyance, in consequence
of the fact that there will be no session of of the legislature
until fourteen months hence; for which great mercy we are devoutly thankful.
I have no doubt that it will be a prominent question, however,
when the new legislature does assemble – provided that body should even
approximately represent the views of the farmers. For that time, then,
Mr. Osborne may keep the matter in view, and I will keep him before the
proper persons, if so desired.

It is quite likely that there will be a lively time about university
matters at that session, and that there will be some sweeping measures
proposed, albeit the constitution fortunately prohibits any direct interference
except in seeing that the objects prescribed by law are fulfilled.
Here comes in the old question about the intent of the Morrill
Bill. It is difficult to foresee how it will be settled, but it is
quite likely that a little more bona fide agriculture will be engrafted
upon the Univ. in some way. In that case the pressure for the appointment
of a working entomologist will be very strong.

Very truly yours
E. W. [?]