Charles Bessey, Letters, 1881

ReadAboutContentsVersionsHelp
166

166

Aiken S. C. Dec 19 '81

My dear sir

Yours of the 16th [was?] just received. Dr Cooke, [?] to his [?] in Iowa, expected to have two more Cents – VII & VIII, (for which he had nearly enough material then) ready for [distribution?] in his [?]. His illness has [?] too much – & now I cannot say definitely when they will be ready. You ask me for contributions to the botanical department of the Naturalist. I have been trying for 18 [minutes?/months?] [?] to re-[?] too long [but?] [Gardenia?] [?] (found about 100 years ago by [?] [?] [?] [?] [?] [?] in Georgia; & [??] text to Botany I. If you think my experience in the search would be interesting enough I can write [?] out. It may [serve?] as a guide to [?] explorers.

Yours very truly H. W. [?]

Last edit over 5 years ago by mdierks
167

167

[?] Chester, Chester Co. Penna. Feby 23rd 1881.

My Dear Prof. Bessey, I returned from Europe two days ago, and found your book on my table. It is now too late to review it, for that has already been well done. But I'll do better, I'll tell my students they must get it, and it my first Agricultural Hall lecture. I shall make no excuse for saying that it is the best book of the kind in the English language. You have produced a marvel of compact, well ldigested, [neat?] botanical literature and for which plan accept not only my congratulations, but as a teacher also my thanks.

Yours faithfully J. T. [Rothbrook?]

Last edit over 5 years ago by mdierks
168

168

West Chester, Chester Co. Penna., Dec. 20 1881

Dear Professor Bessey; I am just in receipt of [yours?]. I have been thinking for some time that I ought to occasionally contribute toward the Am. Nat. I was among its earliest contributors. I continued in full sympathy with it until some of my notes were doctored by editors in such a way as placed me in a very unpleasant relation to a valued friend whose book I was supposed to have reissued. Appeal to the authorities produced hardly any other reply than that they had used their privilege. Of course I simply withdrew. Under present administration my intention is all right. But I am now and probably shall be crowded to the very wall for the next six month for time. After that, I hope to be able to appear again. My pupils [?] will in another year be able to write something creditable, and the Naturalist will probably come in for a full share. I am engaged in a large undertaking which will probably not be [?] for some time, as it is not yet far enough along to have taken shape. I use your text book and find it fills the bill for laboratory work absolutely. We all are inyour debt.

As for [?], our great advantage of being kept busy is that I had hardly thought of the thing except to send a short and pleasantly written reply, probably it should have been more serious and agreeable, but I thought very little about it save to guess that it was [?] between

Last edit over 5 years ago by mdierks
169

169

whom and myself there existed an old [?] time friendship. He [?] me up when I was sent in [wounded?] from Fredericksburg, and of course I write as I would talk to an old friend.

I guess it will all come out right. Coulter has thanked me for the reply and [?] [?]'s intentions were good. At any rate if it were [?] and he had written in down right ugly [word?] (which he could not) I would put out my reply to him in full friendship. In such as I have to [?], you can count on a [share?] for the Naturalist: but for some months it may not be much: – until I am relieved of the present pressure.

Yours sincerely J. T. [?]

Last edit over 5 years ago by mdierks
170

170

[Brookline?] Feb. 27 /81

My Dear Sir,

Would it be possible to obtain of you, the extras of your articles in the Naturalist on botanical subjects, for the library of the [?] [?]. We should be very glad to have them as many are upon

Last edit over 5 years ago by mdierks
Records 166 – 170 of 323